By Daniel Duffield
The consumer
regulator for the federal government issued a statement on Thursday that banks
will be given stricter rules for mortgage lending when assessing borrowers’
ability to repay home mortgages, in an attempt to avoid the loose regulations
to which the recession was partially attributable.
With new
restrictions, banks will be forced to verify borrowers’ income, debt, and
employment.
The Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) stated that its new requirements would also
shield borrowers from irresponsible lending practices by giving incentives for
lenders providing safer, lower-price loan products, primarily less legal
accountability.
The mortgage
industry, which has spent billions within the past year in litigations
regarding falsified loan documents and aggressive lending to borrowers who were
unable to afford their mortgages, will now reward safer lending and those
issuing “qualified mortgages.”
According to
Richard Cordray, the director of the CFPB, lenders should not enable borrowers
to acquire mortgage loans for home
purchases that they will be unable to repay.
With this
reform, financial watchdogs intend to breathe new life into the house financing
market and stimulate the industry, which as of late has been lethargic in the
wake of the credit crisis and the new restrictions on bank action.
Lenders and
consumer organizations have anticipated these new guidelines, which have been
among the most hotly debated updates since the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform
law.
Many
analysts had been apprehensive regarding the new definitions of a “qualified
mortgage,” fearing that this would narrow the type of loans currently
available. However, mortgage bankers have expressed satisfaction with these
updates and specifically remarked about the advantages of the legal protection
provided for those issuing these safer mortgages.
According to
a statement from Debra Still, chairman of the Mortgage Bankers Association
(MBA), this new outlook will incentivize the extension of more sustainable
mortgage credit to qualified
borrowers without having to worry about future litigation or penalties.
While some
consumers questioned whether the rules provided too much protection for
lenders, the general consensus was a welcoming of these changes. Mike Calhoun,
president of the Center for Responsible Lending, commented that these updates
give a “reasonable approach to mortgage lending,” adding that such changes will
facilitate a more competitive and invigorated housing recovery.
Safer Guidelines for Lenders
Essentially,
Dodd-Frank regulators designed a new category of “qualified mortgages” that
would automatically comply with all ability-to-repay requirements. This
regulation was first created by the Federal Reserve, and then passed on to the
consumer bureau in July 2011.
The CFPB
stated that these “qualified mortgages” would include those with no risky
aspects, such as interest-only mortgages or balloon payments, and include no
fees that constitute more than 3% of the loan amount, making them more
affordable. Additionally, these loans could only be issued to borrowers with
debt-to-income ratios (DTI) of 43% or less. As previously indicated, these
loans would include provisions with extra safeguards for lenders willing to
issue these types of mortgages.
While bank
groups had supported the redefinition of these mortgages to all qualified
loans, thereby removing some of consumer rights to litigation on mortgages that
they could repay, consumer groups advocated just the opposite: less protection for
banks and lenders from consumer lawsuits.
With these
new guidelines, most protection would be delegated to cheaper, qualified
mortgages, since, according to the bureau, these prime loans would be assigned
to less-risky consumers with decent credit histories.
In contrast,
more expensive mortgages would get less protection, as lenders would be
expected to verify that their income was adequate. Borrowers could, however,
pursue litigation if they prove that they could not afford the mortgage along
with other living expenses.
Availability of Credit
While the
reception has generally been favorable, some lawmakers and lenders were anxious
that strict rules would worsen the credit crisis that has afflicted the
mortgage market and delayed the both the real estate and economic recovery in
the U.S. Despite these fears, the CFPB addressed these concerns by creating the
rules that facilitated a smooth transition that would not disrupt the current
trends in credit.
Moreover,
these rules initiated a new category of loans that would temporarily be
regarded as qualified. These loans could be granted to borrowers with DTI
ratios greater than 43%, provided they satisfied the underwriting guidelines of
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or one of the other U.S. government housing agencies
such as the Federal Housing
Administration (FHA).
According to
the CFPB, banks will be given until January 2014 to make the appropriate
adjustments in complying with these new standards.

No comments:
Post a Comment